second_grand_trio_concertante
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision
Previous revision
Next revision
|
Previous revision
|
second_grand_trio_concertante [2016/01/18 23:13] admin |
second_grand_trio_concertante [2017/11/27 14:23] (current) |
intonation (chordal and octave), technical facility | intonation (chordal and octave), technical facility |
---- | ---- |
**Sample Recording** : | **Sample Recording** : [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JGu9Idgu7lU]] |
---- | ---- |
**Where to Purchase Sheet Music** : | **Where to Purchase Sheet Music** : [[http://www.sheetmusicplus.com/title/second-grand-trio-concertante-sheet-music/8145668]] |
---- | ---- |
**Annotation**: As a clarinetist himself, James Waterson composed several works for the instrument including this trio. This work is in three movements and is challenging for all parts. The first movement is filled with fast notes that are passed between parts, while the second movement is a slow homage to the slow movements of Mozart. The final movement poses its technical challenges as well, require fast articulated sixteenth notes in all parts. Overall, the work is an excellent choice for an ensemble looking for a work that requires equal facility for each | **Annotation**: As a clarinetist himself, James Waterson composed several works for the instrument including this trio. This work is in three movements and is challenging for all parts. The first movement is filled with fast notes that are passed between parts, while the second movement is a slow homage to the slow movements of Mozart. The final movement poses its technical challenges as well, require fast articulated sixteenth notes in all parts. Overall, the work is an excellent choice for an ensemble looking for a work that requires equal facility for each |
second_grand_trio_concertante.1453183999.txt.gz ยท Last modified: 2017/11/27 14:21 (external edit)